Sarah has been pestering me for months to watch Mamma Mia! She went to the cinema with her friends, one at a time, in order to see it multiple times. She even took Adam. She bought the soundtrack the day it was released. She bought the DVD the day it was released. And finally at the weekend Daniel requested it as our family film time film - brainwashing taken to an extreme.
I should say at this point that I loved the stage show and not just because it was at the Prince Edward Theatre, which is by far my favourite West End venue. I also like some Abba songs and have enjoyed the soundtrack - or at least those sections repeated for singalongs in the car. But I didn't really get the film.
Part of the problem is that it tried to be real and yet wasn't. Perhaps that's my lack of familiarity with musical film tradition showing through, perhaps it's because I can remember what it looked like on stage. In the theatre you willingly play along with the conceit that this few hundred square feet of wood is really somewhere exotic and because it's all make-believe it doesn't seem so ridiculous that the characters should suddenly burst into song. Transport the action to a real Greek island with bona fide trees, genuine sunshine and stonework that would hurt if it fell on your toe, and it's more difficult to explain the uneasy transition between speech and what passes for singing. I think Chicago, which was much closer to a straight filming of the stage show (and which I also haven't seen live), made the transition more smoothly despite some unlikely casting.
And that brings me to the inhabitants, permanent and temporary, of the island. I rather liked Stellan Skarsgard and Colin Firth played his archetypal bumbling Englishman with the usual charm and an unexpected campness. The young lovebirds were fine - although we noted in the DVD extras that off screen Amanda Sayfried's skin is considerably less flawless than the Greek sun made it appear. Julie Walters was great and I didn't like Christine Baranski's Tanya, which I think was supposed to be the point.
Then there was Pierce Brosnan. He wasn't a terrible Bond, and might have been better if the scripts had been up to much. But the only films I've liked him in were The Fourth Protocol (over 20 years ago) and the Thomas Crown remake. In Mamma Mia! his singing has come in for criticism - and rightly so. It's better than mine, but not by much. Yet it was Pavarottiesque compared to his accent. He couldn't remember from one scene to the next whether his character was English, Irish or American.
And then there was Meryl Streep, last seen by me turning out a mesmerising performance in The Devil Wears Prada. This time though I just didn't understand the casting. At no point was she convincing as the mother of a 20-year-old - even less so as the mother of a 20-year-old conceived as the result of a summer of love. Irrespective of the timeline - which seems rather confused - surely Donna should be in her mid-4os. Dear Meryl is about 15 years too old and looks it. I'm full of admiration for her rendition of "The Winner Takes It All", probably my favourite Abba song, but her character is supposed to be tired because of worldweariness, not plain old age.
And the ending, although true to the stage show (as I remember it), was too sickly for words. Even Dame Julie couldn't redeem that one.
Now, where's that classic work of cinematic genius, Torque?